Much
of the problem is that the stereotype of gay men is that they cannot be
"manly" role models. They can be role models in other senses, but not
in the more outdoor activities, rough and tough, brave, etc sort of way
that the word "male" seems to imply. Certainly there are gay men who can
provide models in these things, but it also seems to go with the
territory of being gay (in many cases) that they are role models in
other areas that may not necessarily fit what Boy Scouts is going for.
There are other places to send your children for that sort of role
model.
Of
course, there's also the moral foundations that likely lie behind the
stance, too, which is where the controversy really takes shape. But it's not discrimination if you're standing up for what you believe in under the rights that are entitled to a private organization. There are other orgs out there for those looking for more "gay-friendly" groups to be a part of.Ironically, those who say Boy Scouts and Chick-Fil-A discriminate against gays are the ones discriminating against these organizations and businesses, their rights, and their Christian founders. Many liberals defend themselves by saying there should be a complete separation of church and state, that these orgs have no right to do what they do, but by standing against these orgs they themselves are putting their own opinions as law and forcing others to accept what is a religion in the sense that it is a belief system being forced down everyone's throats.